It’s now scheduled for this week, and while nothing is guaranteed, it looks likely to proceed as planned. That hearing was supposed to come in 2020, but was punted to 2021, and then punted further thanks to the pandemic.
He had exhausted all of his appeals to no avail, but then, in November 2019, he was granted a hearing to argue for a new trial. The odds are not in his favor, but in fairness, neither were the odds that he’d be granted a hearing to even make the argument.
#Tailor tales plus password trial#
This is why Jones’ repeated attempts to get a new trial have never been over-reliant on his claims of innocence. To get a new court hearing, he must convince a judge not that he didn’t commit the crime, but that the trial leading to his conviction was flawed. See the crime scene:Step inside the crime scene at the heart of ‘Accused: The Impending Execution of Elwood Jones’ Ramirez and Jones – when the majority ruled that it could only weigh whether a death row inmate had been effectively represented by his counsel and not whether there was overlooked evidence that he was innocent of the crime. Supreme Court ruling said as much – see Shinn v. But not Jones’.īut the fact is that what Jones says doesn’t matter. It did show that mistakes were made in the investigation and trial, suspects were not all thoroughly vetted, all leads not followed.Ī few stories have changed. Legally, he is guilty of the crime.Īn investigation into the case for the fourth season of The Enquirer’s podcast Accused doesn’t dispute that. Jones, 70, has been on Ohio’s death row since 1996 after a jury found him guilty in the beating death of a New Jersey grandmother who’d traveled to Blue Ash, Ohio, for a dear friend’s grandson’s bar mitzvah. Piepmeier handled the initial case against Elwood Jones for the murder of Rhoda Nathan. Mark Piepmeier, assistant Hamilton County Prosecutor, shown in this 2000 file photo. Twenty-seven years later, Barnhart is set to argue that isn’t true during a three-day hearing scheduled for the end of August, the outcome of which will determine whether Jones gets a new trial. As Enquirer reporter Dan Horn said in that episode, which originally aired in 2001: “The doctor was very compelling in court when he said there is no other way it could have been infected other than from a human mouth.”
#Tailor tales plus password tv#
It’s this evidence that landed the case on the TV show Forensic Files (season 6, episode 22: “Punch Line”). The junk science aspect is related to what court watchers recall being the most damning evidence against Jones during his trial: an infection in his dominant hand that, according to a hand surgeon’s testimony, was teeming with a bacteria called eikenella corrodens – which the surgeon said most likely came from the mouth of his 67-year-old victim, Rhoda Nathan. That’s what going to be talked about this week when Jones, against all odds, gets a new day in court. “I’m all steeped in junk science now,” said Erin Barnhart, Jones’ lawyer, who was assigned to him via the Federal Public Defender Office of the Southern District of Ohio. Listen to the podcast: ‘The impending execution of Elwood Jones’ is available to subscribers So the lawyer representing Ohio death row inmate Jones is going at things a little differently.
0 kommentar(er)
